Tome of Treasures :: View topic - What is Original D&D and what isn't?

Tome of Treasures - Ye destination for discussions of Collectible Adventuring


 

 HomeHome FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister  ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Documento sin título
 
What is Original D&D and what isn't?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Tome of Treasures Forum Index -> TSR Borderlands Keep
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Beyondthebreach
Tome Crew
Tome Crew


Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Last Visit: 21 Sep 2010
Posts: 802
Location: Rochester, NY

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:14 pm    Post subject: What is Original D&D and what isn't? Reply with quote

Here is a question I was wondering before:

What products would be considered designed for Original D&D? Of course, most are easy: The box sets and supplements for instance.

But what about Geomorphs and Monster and Treasure Assortments?

I have them listed in both the Original Dungeons & Dragons Archive and in the "Classic" Dungeons & Dragons Archive. Initially I thought them to be an OD&D product, but the inclusion of Sets One with the Basic Set makes them appear to be a "crossover".

How about the early Character Sheets on the pad? Are they for OD&D rules?

Fazzlewood? I've certainly never the read the original . . .

Wee Warrriors? Are they all OD&D?

Rahasia/Pharaoh?

Any other Tourneys or Publishers who made items designed to use OD&D rules?
_________________
"Ah, Blackadder. Started talking to yourself, I see."

"Yes . . . it's the only way I can be assured of intelligent conversation."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

serleran
Student
Student


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Last Visit: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say anything that was fantasy genre (and clearly not for something else,) published before 1980. But I dunno.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Plaag
Librarian
Librarian


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Last Visit: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 331
Location: Mad City, Wi

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say before early 1977 for OD&D since in 1977 the rules from the booklets got dissected and put either in the Basic Rulebook, or the 1st edition books.

ShaneG.
_________________
I reject your reality and substitute one of my own!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

grodog
Academician
Academician


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Last Visit: 29 Dec 2023
Posts: 230
Location: Wichita, KS

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In spriit, I agree that 1977 could be a good cutoff date, but the various geos are rules-independent, and should probably just be listed as OD&D, then perhaps list the 1980 geos as Classic since the level example was revised to be consistent with Moldvay Basic. For ease of access, they should probably be cross-linked among each other, too.

Monster/Treasure Assortment did go through rules revisions (see TFoster's info on the Acaeum @ http://www.acaeum.com/library/m&tchanges.html), and should be aligned with the appropriate systems (and also cross-linked among themselves).

Tourneys and adventures from 1977 and earlier, in general, are likely OD&D-based for rules, and even until the release of the MM and Holmes Basic, OD&D was the only rules set available, so likely anything run that year was probably written to OD&D. Certainly Tsojconth is OD&D (I can't say for Wee Warriors, Fazzlewood, or Daystar).
_________________
grodog
---
Allan Grohe
grodog@gmail.com
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/greyhawk.html

Editor and Project Manager, Black Blade Publishing
http://www.black-blade-publishing.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger

grodog
Academician
Academician


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Last Visit: 29 Dec 2023
Posts: 230
Location: Wichita, KS

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:25 pm    Post subject: Re: What is Original D&D and what isn't? Reply with quote

Beyondthebreach wrote:
But what about Geomorphs and Monster and Treasure Assortments?

I have them listed in both the Original Dungeons & Dragons Archive and in the "Classic" Dungeons & Dragons Archive. Initially I thought them to be an OD&D product, but the inclusion of Sets One with the Basic Set makes them appear to be a "crossover".


That would be an interesting comparison: my gut says that the examples of play/sample encounters are not Holmes-Basic-complaint, but someone would have to validate.

Beyondthebreach wrote:
How about the early Character Sheets on the pad? Are they for OD&D rules?


Similarly, I would think that all of the PC sheets would be OD&D-based vs. Holmes-Basic based, though that's also worth digging them out to compare.
_________________
grodog
---
Allan Grohe
grodog@gmail.com
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/greyhawk.html

Editor and Project Manager, Black Blade Publishing
http://www.black-blade-publishing.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger

serleran
Student
Student


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Last Visit: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, there was nothing post-77 that was OD&D? No Judges Guild stuff, no other third-party material like Arduin? Wow. I must be in a time warp. :) Naw, just not so good with the dates of publication of the stuff I own (because I've actually never really cared, but that's changing.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Plaag
Librarian
Librarian


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Last Visit: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 331
Location: Mad City, Wi

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well OD&D stuff was still put out after 1977 with printings and jazz, and Judges Guild did use the OD&D works since they had permission from Blume to use things like Greyhawk and Chainmail. Hum..now I wonder if Tegel (booklet L) used OD&D or Basic stats.

ShaneG.
_________________
I reject your reality and substitute one of my own!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

killjoy32
Student
Student


Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Last Visit: 13 Dec 2008
Posts: 22
Location: Warrington, England

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

certainly the stuff such as the wee warriors items of 1976-77 would be OD&D imo...
_________________
Everyone is entitled to my opinion...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Tome of Treasures Forum Index -> TSR Borderlands Keep All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
Documento sin título
 


Powered by phpBB 2.0.22 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Subza theme